US Court of appeals 4th Circuit – Opinion 042566

This appeal, a part of the multidistrict class action antitrust litigation brought against Microsoft Corporation by 39 purchasers of Microsoft’s operating system software and applications software, presents the question whether 26 indirect purchasers have stated a claim upon which relief can be granted. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). The district court granted Microsoft’s motion to dismiss their claims, concluding that because these 26 plaintiffs did not buy software directly from Microsoft, they were indirect purchasers who were barred from seeking recovery for illegal pass-through overcharges under the principles of Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois, 431 U.S. 720
(1977). The court also found that they lacked standing to seek recovery for certain types of injury because the alleged injury did not constitute “antitrust injury,” was speculative, or was generalized and not specific to the plaintiffs. The court dismissed the plaintiffs’ equitable claims under the doctrine of laches.

Continue reading “US Court of appeals 4th Circuit – Opinion 042566”

Possibly Related Posts:

Trib. Roma – Sez. II Civile, Ord. 10 aprile 2006

Illegittimità dell’impedimento da parte dello Stato italiano dell’accesso a siti internet di gambling online comunitari gestiti da operatori autorizzati – obbligo in capo ai Monopoli di Stato di rimozione dei blocchi informatici – sussiste

Continue reading “Trib. Roma – Sez. II Civile, Ord. 10 aprile 2006”

Possibly Related Posts:

Reagire ai pen-test non autorizzati

di Andrea Monti – ICTLEX BRIEFS 1/06

Il concetto, in sintesi Continue reading “Reagire ai pen-test non autorizzati”

Possibly Related Posts:

Controllare l’internet sul luogo di lavoro

di Pierluigi Perri – – ICTLEX BRIEFS 1-06

Il concetto, in sintesi Continue reading “Controllare l’internet sul luogo di lavoro”

Possibly Related Posts: